Showing posts with label development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label development. Show all posts

Sunday, November 4, 2012

On my religious and spiritual journey - Part 3/3

When I started re-evaluating my concept of God and what his will was, I went back to basics. I remembered a scripture in the bible of when Jesus was explaining the purpose of what Mosaic law meant. The law given to Moses had hundreds of commandments of what the Jews had to do and not to and when, etc. The purpose of it all was to ensure that the Jews worshipped God in a certain manner and also that they be protected from harm. Then Jesus implied that after his death, Mosaic law was to be abolished and he said that the whole of God's will can be summarized in only two commandments (not the hundreds given to Moses): 1) Love only God as god, and 2) Love each other as God loves you. That was it.

I concluded that God's will had nothing to do with guilt, and guilt was not a virtue to God! Sure, the bible still has those commandments about how to practice his worship and no idolatry, no fornication, etc, but also it tells me that God does not ask of me any more than I can give and that He will be the only one to judge my sins, errors, behaviors etc. I am not God; I have no place trying to judge other's sins or punishing myself for my own. God who knows what is in my heart, my intentions, why I do the things I do, why I desire the things I do, I believe is the only person fit to pass judgement on me. And that is my "new" thinking. That is how I came to stop feeling depressed about having to make religious sacrifice and how I overcame my guilt for just being human. If I had to do it all over again, I don't think I'd pick a different faith, I'd hope I just merely came to this conclusion faster.

So what is my philosophy? As I’ve discussed previously, my personal values are my family, participating in and enjoying life while I am alive, and not making a world a worse place for anyone or anything. I believe in God, but I also believe in humanity. I believe human's greatest quality is our ability to think and reason for ourselves. I sometimes meet with a religious group whose ideology I mostly share and I call myself a Christian because I do believe in the Bible being a holy book and I aim to follow the guidance provided in it by Jesus Christ. I worship God because I am grateful to him for all I believe he has been responsible in my life. I follow the things the Bible says because I believe it is wise and its mandates are for my overall good. I’m not scared of God that he will punish me in any way because the God I believe in is understanding, merciful, forgiving, and not vengeful. I believe he is far too grand to be offended or hurt by the actions, words, or thoughts of one little person as I am. I understand also that my belief in God may be mythical, as real as he feels to me. So I hold nothing back from this life that I may experience it in an afterlife that I am not 100% guaranteed will actually happen. Once upon a time perhaps my faith was stronger, but for now this is the God and the rules and the values I believe in. This is the type of God I respect, and the type of God I want to emulate.

I love God. My God. I love the type of God that lets me love him and not at the exclusion of also loving myself.


Sunday, October 28, 2012

On my religious and spiritual journey - Part 2/3

If it weren't because of the lack of contact with other believers and an ever deeper instruction in them, I would have joined a Jewish or Buddhist religious organization. I did wish that Judaism had reached out to me further rather than feeling that it was not a religion that encouraged new members from other cultures/ethnic group. So I delved further into going with what was around me, which was for a long time was only Catholicism. I asked a lot of questions and mostly I was shut down because, I was told, some things I just had to accept and believe rather than understand.

Only one religious group welcomed my questions and actively sought to reason with me using a holy book (the bible), "logical" deduction methodology, and my own knowledge of the world and science, etc. This group's philosophy and people welcomed me and I welcomed all their doctrines into my life too. The fact that I welcomed it too shaped the next few years of my life. Many of these group's ideals had been my pre-existing ideals also so that certainly helped to adopt this new religion. It interpreted the bible's New and Old Testaments largely literally - and it even tried to show with historical and scientific correlation how this text / prophecy was a true document that should inspire my belief and obedience. And I still to this day believe it is so, either in spite of or because of my academic background in science.

I came to believe that the bible was a document worthy of my respect and belief, and I believed then that I must do the things it says that I do and don't do in this life. Obeying bible advice was at times instinctive, but often contradictory to what I wanted and desired. No other aspect I think was more pronounced for me than its concept of "fornication" or sex outside of a traditional marriage. That was certainly not instinctive! Yet for very many years I bared my stake/cross and sacrificed my desire for sexual intimacy for the sake of not displeasing the God I had learnt about in the bible. I still don't feel that this sacrifice was in vain or bear resentment of it, but rather I am still proud (and amazed) that I was capable of such dedication, commitment, and self-control for all those many years.

If you asked my why I joined the religion I did (and I'm not talking about Catholicism, which I inherited and never chose), I would say it was because it was the one that to me seemed to have a concept of God and practice that I thought would most resemble a God that I could respect. This God (and this religion) encouraged my questions and helped me find the answers in a book believed to be inspired by God. He was also a God that had many good qualities, that encouraged new followers, and that gave commandments that were meant to benefit me and not merely fill me with guilt. I liked this God, and I liked what he stood for.

Over time I found myself becoming more and more unhappy, depressed, feeling guilty all the time. This was because I was finding it increasingly harder to do what God asked of me and it was really weighing me down. The more I tried to be a good Christian, the more it hurt. I became depressed. There were many reasons that culminated in my depression, but my spiritual beliefs should have been my saviour not the lead weighing me down further. Then I finally put the pieces together to my inescapable depression: one of the main characteristics of depression is undue guilt; and yet one of the tenets/virtues of Christianity is to feel guilt!

In Christianity it is believed that Adam and Eve were guilty of the the original sin (disobedience) and from them all human beings have inherited both the tendency to sin and guilt for this sin of theirs. Do you know how hard it is to overcome depression when you continue to feel guilty? I can see the futility of my thinking now, but for a long time I had no idea why so many of my other co-worshippers were suffering depression too. Guilt will eat you alive! Now, I'm certainly not saying that all cases of depression are due to undue religious guilt, but taking to this concept of Christianity as passionately as I once did does push you further down into a black hole. Luckily, I did not stop learning or thirsting for more knowledge and wisdom once I had become a full member of my new religion.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

On my religious and spiritual journey - Part 1/3

I was baptized as a baby into the Catholic Church. This was not my mum's idea and nor did it actually signify anything as to what my life would be as it was purely done out of cultural and family tradition. Growing up my mum taught my siblings and I to be respectful of others, not hurt them physically or verbally, to be respectful of the law, and basically to treat all human beings as equal and as we wanted to be treated in return. She also taught us about this spiritual being called God that we could never see or hear but that we could talk to in prayer to ask for help and guidance in our lives. She taught us about this book called the bible that had all these stories about God and things he had done for other people who were "good" and others who were "bad". As a result of that I concluded that I wanted to be "good" to please this God being and have his blessing and not upset him and have his punishment in the future, which mostly meant after I was dead. She didn't teach us religious rituals or ritualistic prayers like those practiced in the Catholic Church as she herself did not believe they served any purpose.

When I was seven or eight it was decided that it would be nice for me to get to wear a pretty dress, like other girls in our town did, and partake in Catholic communion. Like my baptism as a baby, it was more about tradition than any religious or spiritual symbolism. A few kids and I met for a few weeks with a very nice and respectable member of the church to learn from an illustrated book about Catholic rituals and a bit more about the stories in the bible about angels, Jesus, his mother Mary, and also about how the communion ceremony would proceed in a few weeks. We rehearsed the ceremony and learnt some Catholic prayers and hymns. My mum had a really pretty white dress prepared for me. I still remember some of the songs we sung and the part of the communion ceremony where I forgot everything we had rehearsed for it, specially of what I was supposed to say to the priest the first time I took the Eucharist and he said something about the "body of Christ". I was completely blank standing in front of him and wondering what I was supposed to say back to him so that he would give me that sticky wafer. I remember he kept asking me over and over again, changing the intonation of his voice to a slightly more angry one, and I couldn't think of anything to say back to him. At one point he inflected his voice to sound like it was a question "body of Christ?" and I thought I had finally figured out the answer. "Yes", I said. No, he repeated it again and then asked if I didn't know how to answer properly. I said, "Yes, please". Finally a child standing behind me in line said to me "you have to say Amen". Finally I said it and the priest gave me the Eucharist, but before I walked away he asked who my communion teacher had been. I can laugh at it now but for years I felt guilty that I had gotten Cesar, my teacher, into trouble by forgetting the word "Amen". (Guilt, mea culpa, and penance were some of the catholic "traditions" of christianity that Cesar had also taught me.) At the end of it all, everyone commented on how pretty I looked in my communion dress, and that to myself and my family is all Catholic communion meant: a chance to wear a pretty dress in front of a lot of people. My baptism had been my grandmother's idea (my mother thought it was a waste of time because I was a baby and I would have had no idea about Christianity), and my communion was town tradition mixed in with vanity.

I completed my Catholic "confirmation" when I was about 10 years old or so. This time it was one my aunt's idea for whatever reason that one my brothers, her son, and I all partake in this ceremony. Again, I had to go to catholic Sunday school for a few weeks. We learnt from another illustrated book about angels, catholic rituals, and Jesus. The book was very colorful and I liked the drawings in it. We also had to go to confession where you'd tell the priest bad stuff you've done and, as if he was some sort of authority, he told you that God would forgive you if you repeated some ritualized prayers so many times. I hated going to it as I had to think for ages on what I could possibly have to feel guilty about at 10 or 11 years old so I could feed to the priest at confession. After some weeks, the communion ceremony was held and we got given little certificates, a little badge with a dove on it, and we took heaps of photos in our nice clothes. Our school principal was at the ceremony and participated in it, which I didn't like because he was very mean to everyone at school and often hit the boys' hands (and once mine also) with a wooden ruler for misbehaving. I thought he was a hypocrite and not a good person, even though he was apparently a good Christian. I knew, though, even at an early age, based on what mum and not any of my Catholic teachers had taught me, that it was not my place to judge him.

After arriving in Australia, I attended a catholic primary school (with the principal I spoke about) and then a catholic high school. High school for me was such a massive change from what I had been in primary school. I finally got over my shyness and I started to form my own ideas about life, etc. As any other teenage kid, I started challenging my superiors and rebelling just for the sake of rebelling. At school I wanted to challenge my religion teacher's doctrine, and at home I wanted to challenge mum's. My mum had started to become involved with a Christian group that went very much against idolatry and religious rituals. I began to wear a crucifix I was given at school as a necklace to irritate her. At school, I would question my religion teacher about some of the scriptures I'd overhead mum learning about at her home bible study and other things I had learn at Catholic Church too. I asked my teacher about worshipping a cross or a manmade icon when God had strictly forbidden such behaviour to the Israelites in what is commonly called "the Ten Commandments", or why I had to call the priest "Father" when Jesus had insisted that not even he (allegedly God's son) be called this let alone any other human being, or why had to talk to the priest to ask for forgiveness and not directly to God if God allegedly loved me and was all-powerful and so should be able to hear my prayer directly, etc. etc. I admit most of the time I was just trying to stir people, my religion teachers or my mum and her friends from her new Christian group, but underneath it all, I guess I was also curious about religion and spirituality. Gradually I started to become more and more interested in theology.

By the time I was 17 I was very much into reading about different religions and theological belief systems. I found Christianity particularly fascinating in that so many hundreds of denominations exist with slightly (or very) different focuses, practices or rituals, and interpretations of what is essentially the same story in one book. The common origin of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity seemed so enthralling to me. The more human-oriented philosophy of Buddhism and Eastern traditions inspired me to wonder more about what is "humanity" in humans. And the polytheist religions both inspired disbelief (because it was so foreign to all I'd ever learnt with only one God) and curiosity as to how models of religion and spirituality are constructed by the minds of human beings. By the end of my schooling and soon after starting university, I was sure I'd one day I'd either join Judaism or Buddhism. I was a lot more preoccupied with religion in my teenage years than in what other teenagers were interested in; yet not completely. Sex interested me. It interested me in the normal way, and it interested me in the way it was so closely related to spirituality in most religions.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

On the things we think about


When I was a kid (truthfully, until recently), I sometimes asked my mum what she was thinking about. I always thought she was lying when she’d say “nothing in particular” or “what I need to buy from the store” or “what I will cook for dinner”, etc. The thing is that I would always be preoccupied with thinking about other things, things with little direct connection to my life, things like what it must it have been like to describe and name a new illness such a AIDS or (even tuberculosis if you were Robert Koch), why does it matter so much to people whether their religious beliefs will be proven right or wrong after death if they’re dead anyway when they see the definitive truth, etc. I wondered why mum never told me that she would think of things like this. Surely, I thought, everyone has abstract thought they dedicate time to. Why would mum not tell me what her “other” non-mundane thoughts were about? Surely a person has more than everyday-survival thoughts, right?

In the last few weeks, due to some difficulties that have affected my family, I have ended up becoming a guardian for my teenage nephew. And you know what? I have finally come to understand that my mum was not lying to me; she was just too busy being a parent to me and my four siblings to have time for non-mundane thought! I have in the last few weeks found myself actually thinking about and planning things that I would normally have left until the last minute, the boring stuff, the mundane stuff: what would be appropriate meals, what would be appropriate discipline, what are appropriate expectations, etc. It really does take up time to be thinking, more so because of my inexperience at this. Yet in a way it is also, I think, a blessing because having someone depend on you forces you to return the centre of Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory of human development. Sometimes a person can spend so much time thinking about how to change the world, how to change the future, about how things of the world should be, that you can forget that changing the world starts at home, with families, with ourselves. 


Sunday, August 5, 2012

On excuses, reasons, and choice


I met someone some time ago who had some personality features I didn’t quite like. We were close for a time and so I told her that some of the things she did bothered and sometimes even hurt me. She told me that it was all because that’s just how she was, that that’s how she had turned out after been raped as a teenager by her father. Of course, that is a terrible thing to happen to anyone and I know it takes a lot of courage to tell your own story. And, of course, I also realise that childhood sexual abuse really does mess you up in so many ways! The strangeness of this particular situation was that this friend said to me fairly often “that’s just how I am” and reminded me about her father. I knew; I wasn’t going to forget what she had told me – it was something deeply serious! However, after so many times that she told me that that’s how she is and it’s due to the childhood sexual abuse she had suffered, I remembered that she wasn’t the only person this had happened to. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a very sad and disturbing thing and every single person this happens to will experience it differently and will be affected differently by it in the long-term. However, I felt that with me she was using it as an excuse for her behaviour so as to avoid apology, or – God forbid – change.

I have known a very many people who have been sexually abused as children and not everyone was as mean as this ‘friend’ was to me; they weren’t obligated to be mean by reason of their terrible experiences. When I remembered this, and at the last straw with this friend, I walked away from it all. Yes, I know that people with histories of abuse in childhood are more likely to have a personality disorder in adulthood than those who never had those experiences. And yet I also believe in the human potential for change. I know that you can take away every choice from a child when he is abused. I also know that at some point a child becomes and adult and all adults have the choice to continue to be victims to the past or to progress from there. It’s a choice. My friend wasn’t without awareness of how her personality and the things she said and did hurt others (myself included), and she was a very smart woman academically and creatively. When I told her that something she did or said hurt me, she didn’t say “I’m sorry. I will try not to do it again”. No, she would say, “that’s just how I am. You know with what my dad did to me”. Yes, I knew that. I also knew he wasn’t currently doing that her; she was no longer a victim, she was just choosing to continue to wear the victim cloak as an excuse not to alter her adult behaviour. Finally, it hurt me too much to continue to be her friend when she found it easier to say “this is how I am” than to alter her behaviour to prevent hurting those that were simply trying to be a good friend to her.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

On memory


I came across an email I wrote a few years ago and it was about something that happened to me in 2007. In 2006 I took some time out of medical school for reasons I’ve discussed many times in this blog. The thing is that in 2007 I returned to finish off my medical degree and I kept running into people I’d known previously from medical school – and they were all surprised that I had returned! The only person, it seems, who wasn’t surprised that I returned to my studies was myself. And yet I struggled to understand why people were surprised given that I never once considered it a possibility of not returning.

Here’s part of the email I wrote to my friend (and, yes, I do write very long emails):
Being back at the hospital I am often running into guys who knew me from a few years ago, and its so weird. Some of them (I guess the ones who knew me a little) tell me that they’re glad to see I came back into it, back to med. This girl even gave me a hug the other day and said exactly that! Now, in my mind I can’t remember ever being as unsure as these people seem to be that I would return. When I decided to take leave, I knew it was just a break, that’s what I wanted, and I don’t remember doubting that I would return, only doubting that if it was to be one rotation off or the rest of the year (that’s all the options the school offered me). But maybe I was projecting something different. I don’t know now, I’m confused. Maybe other people were projecting onto me and doubting my commitment or abilities more than I was. It’s so strange; I don’t recall being that unsure.
I remember feeling empty and alone and overwhelmed - and the insomnia- but it wasn’t even the lowest I have ever been. By comparison that period wasn’t even that bad or even that long-lasting. And I remember a few months after I stopped doing med in 2006, a friend of mine (and I mean a friend not an acquaintance) said to me “you’re not going back, right?” I thought that comment came out of nowhere and I was a little offended, because even at the time of that question I was very convinced that I would – and actually looking forward to returning to med the following year. 
My family also had countless talks to me telling me that I should return to med. I felt it was so pointless because they spoke to me as if trying to convince me of something that was against my will, whereas I felt ‘of course I won’t counter-argue because we both are thinking the same thing’. It was absurd. But of course, I knew that some of them were telling other members of my family that I was a loser who was incapable of finishing a real uni degree. 
And then there was my therapist, who probably knows me better than most of the people in my life and is familiar with most fragments of who I am. She also asked me before I started back, if I actually wanted to go back. Returning to med was never an issue as far as I was concerned; when I would was the only issue present at the time I decided to take time off. And she had known me since before I started to feel all the negative stuff that made me want to take the time off. 
So, my question is: why did everyone doubt that I would return to med; what have I forgotten from that time? Why do I forget? And what else am I forgetting? It’s scary, you know.
The only explanation I can think of for my old acquaintances saying they’re ‘relieved’ to see I came back into med is based on another theory of mine. After I’d already been on leave a few months 
I told two acquaintances of mine from medical school that I was on medical leave. So, my theory is that these two boys must have told a pretty drastic story of how I was and why I’d had the time off. I figured this after I ran into some people and to catch them up on my story I’d tell them that I was a year below them because I’d had some time off – and yet most people already knew that even though I’d only told two people in my course.  They all added that they were glad I had decided to come back. What decision to come back?! I had never doubted whether I would or not. Unless I am forgetting something. Am I forgetting something? 
It’s pretty confusing. I am scared of becoming convinced of something like 2+2=5 if you tell a person enough times, like in that book 1984. Maybe the whole world is really like that, and the world trade centre really just fell accidentally and there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and you can convince a person that the world has always been the way it is and nothing of the past atrocities brought us to this “progress”. But then what do memories serve us for? To confuse us? To make us suffer because of the incongruences?...
What I’ve come to realize since the time I wrote that email is that in this world it is dangerous to believe what others tell you about yourself. Hitler, for example, surrounded himself with yes-men, people who agreed with his every word and told him his every idea was genius. Isn’t the same equally true if others are constantly beating us down and telling us what a failure we are and how unlikely we are to succeed? We need not surround ourselves with only our worshippers and we don’t have to believe our oppressors, but the truest stories are sometimes those we write ourselves. The story of Vanessa is best written by Vanessa; and if I want to describe a positive person, then I have to build my story to allow myself to become that positive person. It’s taken me a while to figure that out, but my story is a work in progress.

Monday, June 25, 2012

On what we teach about sex


A few incidents in the last few years of work have made me wonder about the different ways and the different things that parents educate their children about sex. There’s the biological stuff, which is what parents for some reason think is most confronting, but that every single generation in every single country and in fact every sexually-reproducing species since the beginning of animal existence has figured out quite easily. A parent could get away with not ever mentioning to their offspring how babies are made, where they come out of, and the logistics of what sexual intercourse entails, and they’d pick it up anyway. I mean, in most cultures before our grandparents generation such things weren’t discussed by parents with their children – and yet people still had sex and had children, etc. It’s even less of a concern in modern days where there’s television and other media, there’s schools purposely teaching this stuff, and there’s other people (e.g. peers, relatives, health professionals, etc.) who will readily discuss the biology of sex with anyone. So it’s not what we teach children about the physiology of sex that concerns me, but that other stuff we tend to forget about sometimes, the psychosocial aspects of sex in a person’s life.

To go back again to the “olden” days now. Religion used to be a big part in a greater proportion of people’s lives ‘back in the olden days’. That’s a fact, that less people these days than, say, 100 years ago had a religious affiliation, whether that be because they elected to or were expected to by state mandates. In most religions, sex has/had a spiritual connotation and there were rules and consequences described around it. If you had sex before a marriage was confirmed, with someone outside of that marriage agreement, etc. you had “sinned” and would incur a punishment for it. Now, the punishment would be either or both imposed upon you by the church (e.g. been disassociated from the congregation) or by God (e.g. you were lead to believe that God would punish you by disapproval or loss of a post-life privilege, dependant on what the religious creed was). For the non-religious (and of course still applied to the religious) in ‘the olden days’, there was this thing about reputation and social norms.  Of course, social norms and expectations (as does religion) still exist, but modern Western culture places less of an emphasis on it, and more on being your own individual. So our parents and grandparents generation placed greater emphasis on whether others thought or knew that you had been engaging in something as disreputable as having sex with someone you weren’t married to. Sex was a shameful thing. Even for those that were married, it was not a proper thing to discuss or make jokes about or depict in media or entertainment, etc. So, back in the day a parent who educated a child about the psychosocial aspects of sex (the physiology been much too embarrassing to discuss outside of biology classes or by scientists), all you had to do is tell the child not to have sex because they’d either go to hell and die or that the whole town would call them a slut and their life would be miserable.

What are we teaching our children now about sex? Everyone knows about the physiology of sex, even very young children, and parents and their children will share very explicit details about sex. What’s wrong with that? Nothing – except that sex to human beings isn’t just about the biology of it. There’s nothing wrong with having all this knowledge about sex at all! But I’m beginning to believe that we’ve taken too much comfort in only sharing the easy stuff about sex, the stuff every child will eventually figure out even if their parent never tells them about, and have left our children with the hard stuff to figure out on their own.

In my job I’ve met many teenagers having absolutely never considered some of the other consequences of sex, let alone how to deal with them. We teach our children about sex, what it entails, that there’s the possibility of pregnancy and infections, to use condoms to prevent infections, and to use contraception to avoid pregnancy. But where children are missing out on instruction is about romantic relationships, who to have sex with, why or why not to have sex, how is sex related to love, should sex bear any relationship to love at all? These are all questions that increasingly younger people are having to charge through on their own. And I’d like to share with you some examples of questions that I have witnessed some very anxious teenagers try to deal with on their own too:
  • How do I tell my parents I’m pregnant? Do they need to know?
  • How do I tell my ex-boyfriend that I’m pregnant? Should I tell him?
  • Should I tell my parents or my ex-partner/s that I have and STD? How can I tell them?
  • Why did I get an STD when I was with a person I loved?
  • Should I quit school because the other students won’t stop bullying me about being pregnant in high school?
  • Is it ok to be sad about having a miscarriage even though no one else knew I was pregnant?
  • What do I do now that I’m pregnant and my parents don’t want me to be and I still haven’t formed a concept on how I feel about abortion?
  • How do I tell my girlfriend without hurting her feelings that I think she has a problem ‘down below’ because those warts don’t look normal?
  • How can I get an STD when I use a condom all the time except with my regular girlfriend and she isn’t with anyone other than me?
  • Is sex always meant to be painful or is it just because I don’t actually want it when it happens?
  • Is it normal not to have had sex yet at my age? Does that mean I am lacking something or am sick?

Can a parent or anything in life prepare you to answer those questions? I don’t know. But it certainly would break your heart to have first considered questions like these when they apply directly to you and the situation you find yourself in. I say, good on us for talking to our children openly about sex and the need for safe sex practices and why they’re important, but it’s now time to do the real hard work: prepare our children to think of the consequences if they do find themselves in situations where the safe sex has simply failed. Encourage the young person to think of their own opinions about abortion, about social discrimination against teen parents, about sexually transmitted infections, about the link between love, sex, and relationships, about the effect on career development and parenthood, etc. We don’t need to mandate our kids to the effect of “don’t have sex or you’ll die”, but we could encourage them to ask themselves “could I deal with any of the consequences of sex? If not, then do I need to delay sex for now?” And do this not because the child will go to hell or society will ostracize him, but because he is an independent being worthy of not suffering the negative consequences of sex.

Monday, January 2, 2012

On me... and turning 30

It’s funny, if you ask some people who have really gotten to know me intimately they’ll tell you that I have several different personalities. These people have at times asked me who is the “real” Vanessa. I can tell you straight out that ALL of them are. If you’d met me some years ago and asked me to list the things that to me are the most important in life I would have told you: family, love, expression, enjoyment, spirituality, and work. If you met me at another point in my life I would have answered exactly the same thing – but in a different order! That is where my “inconsistencies” lie, but actually I am just very average J

The self-hating years
The single most hurtful thing ever said to me was “you’ve had a perfect life”. Yeah, it was hurtful because it was said by someone close to me who obviously didn’t know me much at all. I don’t believe there are such things as perfect lives or perfect childhoods, everyone does the best with what they’re given. I don’t know if I am (or was?) autistic to a degree, but I never really connected with anyone as a child. And it didn’t bother me to have no friends; I was quite happy in my own inner world, my make-believe play, and reading books to learn something that interested me. At age 10 I was faced with circumstances that are actually very common in most cultures but that I would never wish upon anyone. As a result of this I lost the ability to trust, to believe, to feel safe and worthwhile. From then on I started hating more than just my own physical self, but also my future self, believing that I deserved nothing good to ever come to me in my life. It was very draining, and my inner world grew increasingly darker and I became more and more self-deprecating.

At about the age of 20, after I had finished my undergraduate degree in science, the self-loathing and self-denial of my own need to be human finally climaxed. I started psychotherapy for the first time then. What came of it? My single greatest victory was to forgive those that had hurt me and to forgive myself for being hurt. It seems so miniscule and meaningless that I can summarise it in one sentence, but the amount of healing the simple act of swapping the words “sorry” for “thank you” is hardly able to be explained. I finally stopped apologising for being Vanessa, for allowing myself as a child to be hurt, and I stopped apologising for the simple fact of being alive. Instead I started to be grateful to be alive and I allowed myself to have (and not feel guilty about having) human needs of personal fulfilment and achievement. It was a very slow process to accept myself, to disrobe myself of the self-loathing, to finally become and be comfortable in being Vanessa in all my forms.

At 24 my curiosity and interest in spiritual matters brought me to commit to Christianity after having studied several theological and philosophical systems for many years. What lead me to finally make this commitment was that I came to understand that it’s ok to not be perfect, it’s human nature, and that the ability to feel connection to God is not barred to me or anyone else regardless of their past, present, or future. That was spiritual commitment and to some extent also fulfilment. During and after this time I also gradually learnt to not hate or feel ashamed of my physical appearance, of my lack of social skills, of my naivety, and of all these things I had for which I felt I couldn’t be like “normal” people. I guess in all this I may have eventually overshot the mark  :P

The self-loving years
I was around 26 before I could bear the thought of being ok with being seeing as me, as a complete and separate person of my own. I guess by that stage I had allowed people to get to know me, all aspects of me, and to become my friends who I could trust and expect some trust and caring in return. I grew more confident in many things also. I finally was not afraid or concerned to be seen for me. I was nearly 27 before I finally allowed myself to remove my clothes off in front of another human being – someone of my choosing and with my full consent. This part was the hardest step for me, the rest was quite easy. And in fact it probably got to be a bit too easy J

My mistake was that after I learnt to love myself, I probably started to love only myself. I started to consider romantic partners as purely things to increase my own enjoyment and happiness. They say that people with histories of abuse most often become either one of two things in their future relationships: the abuser or the abused. I had decided from when I was 20 and started therapy, that I would never again be a victim of abuse. And so here I was, playing out another role. I had never had a time in my life when I didn’t feel guilty about being alive, but maybe at times it would have been good to at least feel pity for others. Needless to say, several  partners later, I still wasn’t a winner. Despite me finally being able to love myself and form sort of bonds with others, I still hadn’t learnt what it was like to love others. I mean, of course, what it was like to be in love.

The loving years
Wait, having sex and making love aren’t the same things?... No. I eventually learnt that too. June 2010, or sometime after that, I fell in love for the first time in my life! How did I know it was different? Because I found myself missing someone else, wanting someone else’s approval, feeling safe and confident to be associated with someone, feeling a part of something very special. It didn’t last long and I was a different kind of sad to what I’d previously known when it ended. But you know what bothered me most about it ending? Because after all those years it had taken me to convince myself that I was a worthy human being, the overwhelming message I was getting was that I wasn’t worthy of another being’s sacrifice to be with me. My partner wouldn’t sacrifice any of the things I would have sacrificed in a heartbeat to be with them. And that hurt me so much. It was like being told all over again that I wasn’t a worthy human being. But this time I didn’t believe it for long, because sometimes all you can do is let go and remember that regardless of what someone may think of me, I am still Vanessa.

And then the unthinkable happened and I fell in love for the second time in my life. Wow! What a blessing it was. It was beyond what I had ever imagined;  my new love met and exceeded every standard I ever had. This was truly the love of my life, the one person you could have sworn was fabricated purely using every guideline for a good person I had in my mind. Words can’t do this story justice. Of course, I was in love with this person so you’d be right in saying I am biased, but I didn’t care what anyone had to say. The only approval I needed in this world was from this one person . Truly, never have I felt so secure, so safe, so myself, so part of something greater than special, than when I was part of this partnership. Then the worst thing happened! The worst thing to have happened to me at this moment in time after what I’ve been through, I mean. There were reasons for it, but I was left alone again. I only wish I had been given a chance to correct my flaws, that whatever good was at first seen in me (what I think I see in myself too) would have been worthy of another chance, of a sacrifice. Or am I really not as worthy as I think I am?

The years of being loved
I hope in future to be loved, but it’s not enough just to be loved here and now. I hope to have someone fall in love with me truly, to want me, to wish to be with me, and that this wish is enough to motivate the things every successful relationship needs: compromise and self-sacrifice. I am worth it, right? I think I am. It’s been 30 years, and I’m ready to be loved the way I eventually learnt to love too. I am ready for so many things. But I am ready mostly to say that only God can judge me for my life.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

On being old enough to know better

Dave Chappelle, comedian, does a very funny yet thought-provoking skit on age and responsibility. The question arose about musician R. Kelly’s 2002 arrest for urinating on a girl who at the time of the alleged incident was 14 years old. The girl in question at one point is said to have consented to being peed on, but still everyone criticized Mr. Kelly because in either case the “girl” was underage and shouldn’t have been sexually involved with an adult. Poor girl, right? Didn’t realise the consequences of her consent, etc. etc.

Then another incident Dave Chappelle discusses is about Lionel Tate, who when he was 12 years old was play-wrestling with a 6 year old girl using moves similar to what he had seen TV wrestlers do. The 6 year old girl died from injuries sustained from this “game”. The boy was arrested and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Apparently he should have known by the time he was 12 years old that his actions have consequences, etc. etc.

Finally he talks about Elizabeth Smart, a girl who when she was 14 years old was abducted from her home and taken captive by a couple who lived not very far from her own family home. According to the way Dave Chappelle tells it, she wasn’t physically restrained or locked up, but was advised by her captors not to flee. She obeyed. She remained at this site from June to August 2002 before being relocated elsewhere for a further six or seven months. But for at least two months she was situated very close to her own home, possibly within walking distance, often unsupervised at this place, not locked up or restrained – and yet she remained docile to her captors without allegedly even attempting to flee. Of course, it was unfortunate and not her fault at all that she was abducted, but shouldn’t she have known by the age of 14 years that her actions have consequences, that she could and should act, etc. etc.? Poor girl, right? Didn’t know what to do.... But wait, Lionel Tate knew exactly what to do and how to do it apparently by age 12!

The reason that these stories have come to my mind recently is because of the “poor boy” who was arrested in Indonesia and is being tried for drug-related charges. He is an Australian citizen and he is 14 years old. Those two facts are the main reasons we are enticed to have sympathy for this “boy”. He is alleged to have bought drugs while on holidays in Indonesia. Apparently he didn’t realise the gravity or consequences of his actions either because of his young age or because of his alleged addiction to the drug he sought, etc. etc.

So how old is old enough? How old is 14, really? Old enough to know better, or too young to know what you’re doing? If it’s not old enough, then let the “poor boy” in Indonesia out of prison to live his life and learn what is good and what is right and what isn’t. And let 14 year old girls decide if they want to have sex with adult men or whether they want to get peed on or not without prosecuting the adult involved. But if 14 is really too young to know better, then Lionel Tate deserves a big apology for the malice attributed to him when he was 12 and killed his 6 year old playmate. Luckily for him, this did in fact happen and he was eventually released from prison and went on to learn what is good and what is bad... (Almost a “and he lived happily ever after” story, except for the fact that when he was released from prison he went and committed other crimes  that bought him a fresh 30 years incarceration that he can no longer blame on his young age.)

The ability to make “adult” human decisions relies on the prefrontal cortex of the brain. This part of the human body does not reach its full developmental peak until you hit your early 20s. To me this has some interesting implications not only related to criminal law (as demonstrated in the examples above), but also to medical ethics, and to psychosocial development. In medicine we accept that children (by Australian law, under the age of 18 years) may competently consent to some things like taking a contraceptive tablet, having a blood test, allowing a physical examination by a health professional, etc. By the same token, the same person at the same age may be considered not competent enough to consent to, for example, reproductive sterilization or an organ transplantation / donation. It’s a matter of being competent enough, recognising that a person’s cognitive development is a dynamic thing evolving across multiple tracks until, hopefully, they all eventually reach a maximum and you reach your “adult” competence stage.

The other interesting thing about this gradual stepwise development in our ‘human nature’ relates back to the previous discussion on criminality. Maybe instead of focusing on “is 14 years old enough to be considered responsible for a crime?”, we should consider “is this person who is still in the dynamic stage of their cognitive development able  to be taught or rehabilitated to make choices that will decrease their chances of becoming further involved in criminal activity in the future?” Remember Lionel Tate? He was 12 in 1999 when he killed the six-year-old girl. In 2001 he was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. He was later released on appeal in 2004. In total he was in criminal detention from the ages of 12 until he was 17. What did Lionel Tate learn from the ages of 12 to 17? Who knows. But this would have been an amazingly opportune time to teach him exactly what the consequences to a person’s actions are, what taking responsibility means, how to get ahead in life without victimizing others for your own advancement. Would he have been a different person if this had happened? Who knows. But really, what have we got to lose?


Sunday, August 21, 2011

On teen suicide... and living


A few months ago when Declan Crouch, a 13 year old boy, went missing, his disappearance was likened to Daniel Morcombe’s. However, after some time it proved that the age of the boys and the fact that they were reported as missing persons may have been all they shared in similarity. The fate of both boys have become more clarified in the recent months and it’s not my intention here to rehash the news. But I do want to rehash a thought I once had on teenage suicide.

I read a book by Udo Grashoff called ‘Let me Finish’. It’s a copy of and study on a series of suicide letters. One of the interesting findings is that the suicide letters written by teenagers are the most mysterious, confusing, and give the least detail on motive. They're often very profound philosophically and spiritually. They list their motives not in terms of their personal struggles, but rather about the plight of humanity in general. For example, a child who is being bullied or is being subject to abuse from their carers actually rarely writes about their personal experience and their circumstance. Their suicide letters tend more to be filled with their insights into humanity, the negative aspects of our society in general, and they often conclude with a wish for us who remain alive to be well. To an external party looking at their case we may see a child who was suffering due to abuse and become so stressed that they choose to end it all. What the children themselves tell us is that it is not dissatisfaction with their own circumstance, but rather with our society and our world in general.

One of the things often said of suicide is that it’s a permanent solution to a temporary problem, and in the case of adolescents you could even argue that their decisions are made on generalizations about the rest of the world based just on their personal negative experience of it in their microcosm, for the short time of their lives that they’ve had to experience it. However, having said that, isn’t it true that our world is, in fact, a lot like a typical adolescent’s microcosm? The ‘popular kids’ with money and power (corporate types and politicians) set the trend for the majority of us. The majority of us are here just to do what they’re meant to do to survive (the ‘working class’), and trying to behave so as not to piss off the popular kids or those in power, like our parents and teachers (law and government). And no-one really wants to get in trouble with these people (jail-time, fines, oppression, getting fired, etc.)! When teens suicide, we as adults think, 'but they have so much more to lose by dying', but it's almost as if they leave us saying 'we have so much more to gain via death'. And compared to more mature adults, their decision to die seem to be more definitive. They hesitate less.

Is there something adolescents see about our society that makes them so sure? Before I get onto that, I just want to acknowledge that we already know that the human brain’s prefrontal cortex, which is tasked with making our ‘mature’ and ‘rational’ decisions, isn’t fully developed until about the age of 21 years. Of course, people “mature” at different rates and it is said that females will reach this stage before males do. It is also not a yes-no type of separation between maturity and immaturity. Possibly since before the age of 2 years a child can make decisions based on preference (of colour, taste, texture), etc. Gradually, as a child matures, different aspects of a particular choice creeps into their decision-making process (e.g. immediate and long-term consequences, cost, effect on self and others). So what I am trying to say is that I acknowledge that an adolescent is not ‘fully mature’, but taking a look into their thought process is definitely worthwhile, especially given that a teen who suicides is making a very significant and conscious choice.

What, in signing off ‘I have so much more to gain via death’ does a teen aim to achieve? An older adult may see in the teen potential in terms of years of life remaining, in abilities that can be developed, and in knowledge to be gained. But it's almost as if the teen turns around and says, 'I can see where this is going and I'm not interested'. What exactly about our world are they seeing? I suggest that a teen may be rejecting a world they perceive as being unjust or incoherent. Now, I already mentioned that they may be overgeneralizing their particular situation to the whole of the future and the whole of society, but let’s pose for a second that they aren’t exaggerating in their perception. Let’s consider. for example, what the “adult world”, the “real” world is like.

As a child when I didn’t get my way, I cried and threw a tantrum. As I grew older I learnt to hold back the tears and the rage (things I instinctively want to do when I don’t get my way), to accept that things aren’t always going to go my way. Now I was considered mature. Yet the same reality was still true: I lost! As adults we always have a choice, though not all options necessarily produce equally ego-syntonic results: to accept things as they are, or to act so as to change them. The truth, however, is that most people live in stagnation, we get too used to accepting injustice; trying to change things is too hard. That’s the reality and cowardice a lot of people live/exist in. A lot of adults in our society become docile little cogwheels, indifferent, accepting of injustice (to ourselves and other human beings), dampening our true feelings and passions, working the jobs we have rather than the ones we want – always at the bequest of the ‘popular kids’ and in fear of punishment. How is that living? Really? What really is the difference in between an existence like that and death? I can see how to the teen this inaction may look remarkably close to death already.

And yet having said all this, you’d think I’d be petitioning for us all to suicide! In fact I’m petitioning that we all instead start living, deciding our own fates. Every revolution is fought by individuals, and we are all qualified. No-one ever asked permission to start a revolution. So why not start living as if we were actually alive?

Monday, August 15, 2011

On a curious incident


A few weeks ago I received a phone call at work from Centrelink, our blessed government welfare agency. Usually when they call doctors it’s to verify that their clients haven’t been falsifying medical certificates to exempt them from job-seeking activities or to ask further details about a patient’s medical condition on one of their thousand forms (which they so commonly misplace). This time when they called me, it was to ask another request of me: to diagnose a medical condition that would label my patient as permanently disabled. Wait, what?! To make my patient sick? To label my patient as sick? But, more intriguingly, why? And here was the Centrelink officer’s reason: because it was getting to be too much hard work to try to find this patient work!

I get it; sometimes the patients want us to give them a medical certificate to excuse them from work for a few days, almost always for very legitimate reasons. Then those who would cheat the system regardless of whatever system was in place want us also at times to write similar certificates to secure government disability pensions, have their airfares or gym memberships refunded, to postpone academic assessments, to get those much-coveted disabled parking permits, etc. etc. But this “please diagnose disability” did not seem to me as a simple request (even though you could very rightly refer to it as a request to be a co-participant in federal fraud); it was at least to me about something much more than about money. It also was not something the patient himself has asked of me.

I’ve previously discussed about the dangers of labels. And surely also some labels have their advantages, for example, in forming self-identity and bringing likeminded people together. However, my concern at this particular request was (aside from the fact it is at least unethical if not illegal to lie about a patient’s medical condition) about the effect labelling my patient as disabled, as ‘writing him off’, would have on him. The patient had seen me previously and not asked that I fill out any Centrelink form and surely did not mention about considering himself unfit for work due to physical and/or mental limitation. As almost every other patient that walks into a consulting room, their focus was on getting better and that was what we discussed – and one reason he wanted to get better was that he was keen to re-enter the workforce and get on with other socially-enriching activities of life! This reason especially is why the Centrelink officer’s request so surprised me. Of course I asked her to not just send me forms but rather to send me the patient back because I wanted to ensure we were all on the same page.

In short, the Centrelink officer’s agenda was an act of desperation because she was struggling with her own job: helping my patient find paid employment. It is very much easier in this, as in many other “people jobs”, to just give people what they want despite the company policy or government rules or laws or our own position on a matter. It’s the easy way, right. But the easy way is so rarely the right way. What I’m trying to say is I don’t blame this poor public servant for wanting to make perhaps two people’s lives easier. What I do, however, have a problem with is to allow this person (the patient) to opt out of life.

I say opt out of life rather than opt out of the workforce or even opt out of ‘effort’ not to be dramatic, but because a simple fact of human life is that in the majority of situations we define ourselves by our work. Think for example how when you first meet a person one of the first few questions you ask them is what they do ‘for a living’. Knowing this tells us a lot about a person, yes based on stereotypes, but in education stereotypes are one of these essential things for learning. Knowing what a person does for work tells us about their education, their finances, their likely social circles, etc. But, of course, none of these things are of primary importance and the stereotypes fade once you get to know the individual. Have you ever been unemployed or met someone who is unemployed and they referred to what they previously did for a job or what they’re looking into getting? It’s a bit of a matter of healthy pride, to let you know that they are still a part of human society.

I have previously touched on the concept of maintaining societal involvement in order to preserve our mental health. The DSM defines mental illness by a variety of particular symptoms, and furthermore that they cause significant “distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning”. For example, we all have felt sad but not as many of us have been so sad that it interfered with our ability to shower or eat, etc. for weeks or months and so being able to be rightly diagnosed with depression. OK, but here I am discussing not mental illness but rather societal involvement. Mental illness leads to decreased involvement, but it also worthwhile to consider that the decreased involvement can also exacerbate negative mental states. As I have mentioned in a previous post, one of the methods used as punishment in our society is imprisonment. The punishment isn’t just about keeping you separate from your family, friends, and other people, but also of depriving you of all other types of social environments such as work.

So, let me summarise why this whole incident caused me such a dilemma 1) it was not a request by my patient but a third party, and 2) I didn’t feel right about labelling my patient as disabled, and 3) I didn’t want my patient to be excluded from societal involvement and be exposed to the negative effects that come with it. 

Saturday, December 11, 2010

On ‘childish’ people and abuse

I met a lady in Chile who asked me if I knew why some people are just so childish. She was talking about members of her own family, and I guess she asked me because she thought I might have learnt something about this in my psychology classes. I didn’t. I had read a little about post-abuse syndromes, though (e.g. the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome). Now, an example of the “childish” behaviour she was talking about is two adult siblings bickering and maybe even physically confronting each other, divulging each other’s secrets in order to offend or hurt the other, pitting other family members against each other, etc. Immature behaviour? Yes. Childish? Maybe not the best word to use; children often lack the noxious intent adults seem to use. There are many adults, though, who having the skills and abilities of an adult, behave (and usually also think) as children.

I don’t mean adults acting like children in a derogatory way. I mean adults acting in “immature” ways, as in the mature versus immature coping mechanisms psychology tells us about. For example, say someone cuts you off in traffic. The mature thing to do is acknowledge you’ve been wronged, but given that the situation is fleeting and didn’t result in greater harm, you acknowledge your emotion (anger, sadness, etc.) and move on. The immature thing to do is to scream your head off at the other driver, maybe tailgate him, maybe become physically abusive if you get the chance to. The reason it would be an immature thing to do is because the reaction is disproportionate to the slight – and because you didn’t exercise self-control in response to the emotion you felt. OK, so there are immature and mature behaviours or responses that are designated as such by social norms, moral and psychosocial values, prevalence rates, etc. Now, the very same things that determine whether a behaviour is a mature or an immature response usually have to be learnt – and often in childhood. You can see this way that if you didn’t learn these things in childhood, how to behave “maturely”, the only way you know to respond is in a child-like manner: instinct and survival based, with immediacy, and without regulation of affect.

One of the things I remember reading about children who are abused (whether emotionally, physically, sexually, or whatever other horrible way we have to inflict suffering) is that their emotional development is gravely stunted. These children will have normal psychosocial and cognitive development until the point where they encounter the abuse, then will often remain in that stage of psychocognitive development until adulthood. You can see, therefore, how it follows that individuals that behave childishly are doing so because that is all they know. They react and act like a child because they haven’t learnt any other way to be. Of course, on the receiving end of it, when you as an adult encounter these people who are also physically adult like yourself, you expect them to act like you would and when they don’t we label them as childish.

So that is what I told my friend in Chile, that that at least was my understanding of how some people act the way they do. But in telling this story, you also must think about the people that have the background of childhood abuse and who have learnt to behave more maturely than a child would.

Abuse tends to rid us of many choices, of many liberties and human rights, and especially in childhood can be absolutely shattering to a person. But for those that are fortunate enough, to have escaped childhood abuse and reached a plateau into adult life, there is one choice, one moment of insight, that is all-empowering: making the choice of continuing to be the abused child of the past or becoming the adult that takes responsibility for his/her future experiences. Of course, I am trivializing a lot of things, and sorting through the behaviours and thought patterns of previous abuse victims, identifying the cognitive errors that have been laid down over repeated exposure to abuse, and eventually changing these behaviours, can take years (if ever achieved). The hardest thing to do isn’t doing all the cognitive work, however, it is that first step: believing that you, even you as a victim of abuse, now have power to decide to change things. To me, the difference between two people who have suffered childhood abuse, one who is mature and one who is immature in his interrelational style is that one of them had a moment of insight when he finally understood the words:

“You’re not powerless. You are not sick. You did not deserve what you got, but things can be better.”

Now, my friend in Chile is a very mature, very humble, and very loving person. When I told her about how some of these ‘childish’ people possibly had a troubled childhood, and are possibly cognitively and emotionally stuck there through little fault of their own, she bowed her head down as if remembering some distant memory only she knows about and told me how she really did feel sorry for her family members, even if they did act so negatively and immaturely towards others. And I guess that’s the other point I wanted to make, that perhaps instead of been irritated by these “childish” people, we take a moment to reflect on how sad their lives have probably been.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

On "coming out"

One of my favourite quotes in the world is one by Gore Vidal that says “There is no such thing as a homosexual or a heterosexual person. There are only homo- or heterosexual acts. Most people are a mixture of impulses, if not practices”. He also said, “Actually, there is no such thing as a homosexual person, any more than there is such a thing as a heterosexual person. The words are adjectives describing sexual acts, not people”. Okay, so some of this argument is about semantics, but it is also about labels.

If you know me, you would know that I have a hatred of labels— and so comes this ambivalence about the whole concept of “coming out”. I do understand that the whole movement started as a way to counter discrimination against certain people because of their sexual practices, to claim back the respect and human rights owed to every human being. I understand how it is empowering, especially to individuals who have been oppressed, to claim with pride the person they are and their right to be. I understand that identifying with a group, coming together for camaraderie, is a very human thing and it is often the only way to bring about societal change. I understand how it came about, what I don’t like, however, is the expectation that is now placed on many people to “come out”, to label oneself as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, or ‘questioning’.

One reason I don’t like the concept of “coming out” is that I find it biased that a person who has sex with a same-sex individual has to tell people about it, yet there is no expectation that a person who only engages in heterosexual acts do so. There are things about the sexual practices of my friends, my family, acquaintances, celebrities, politicians, and many other people that I don’t know about – and quite frankly couldn’t care less about. How old where they when they first had intercourse? What is their favourite sexual position? Are they multi-orgasmic? Do they prefer shaven or hairy genitals on their partner? Do they use toys? These are extremely personal and intimate questions about a person’s sexuality and we rarely are even bothered to know these things about people, so why should we care to know other intimate things like whether they have sex with men, women, or both. Does it change anything? No, it shouldn’t, especially if they’re your friends or family. Seriously, who would like to know all the sexual details of their friends or family? Not me. So why does there need to be this expectation that if you have sex with someone of your same gender that you have to tell the whole world about it? Quite frankly I have friends who are probably virgins, others that may or may not have had same-sex intercourse before, but I just really don’t care to hear about their sexual exploits one way or another. Sexual expression is a very intimate thing, usually only between two people, and that’s the way I am happy for it to stay.

And the other reason I am passionately against declaring your sexual preference is because of my hatred of labels. See, because once you tell the world you’re “gay” or “bisexual” that is all the world tends to see. You in fact lose a lot of your identity and become just a label, often described by a multitude of stereotypes. You may have sex with same-sex persons, but it’s probably not all you do. Maybe you have a job you’re very good at, maybe you follow a certain spiritual belief system, maybe you play an instrument or have a large family; but the moment you label yourself, that to me is like the death of the rest of you. And imagine being known for and described in terms of the things you like to do sexually! We would meet a lot of people, some of them our friends and family members, that were known as masturbators, others dildo-lovers, others anal-lovers, etc. But this is what some of our friends do and yet we think of them as friends, not as “straight” friends or “dildo-loving” friends, just our friends. The things our friends do and enjoy sexually is a personal matter for them and they aren’t and shouldn’t be expected to tell everyone about it, to “come out” as a dildo-lover or anal-bead enthusiast... So to “coming out” as gay or bisexual or transsexual, I say no (unless you consciencelessly choose to label yourself for whatever reason, for whatever secondary gain). To me, labelling isn’t creating equality. Labelling, putting up a division between “us” and “them”, isn’t creating equality between “us” and “them”, it just perpetuates the myth that people who have sex with same-sex individuals are purely defined by the sexual things they do. For me, to say a person is gay is a denial of everything else they are – and they may just be the best human being I know.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

On labels and self-esteem

I was discussing with a friend of mine one day on how sometimes the worst thing we can do is label ourselves. See, ever since I met my friend she told me she’s a very shy girl – and I guess she is, but it’s not all she is.

Now, the issue of shyness is very close to my heart because I was painfully shy up until the time I started high school. And when I say ‘painfully’, I mean it really did cause me a lot of psychological stress. A lot of people who’ve met me in the last few years would find it hard to believe that I was once a shy person, but anyone from my family could confirm to you how true this is. When I was in primary school (both in Australia and in El Salvador), through every year I progressed, my teachers would speak to my mum to ask why I didn’t interact with any of the other children. I guess the concern was that I was autistic or had some sort of sensory deficit. My mum would explain to them, year after year, that I didn’t have a speech impediment, that I really both understood and spoke the language, and that I could communicate verbally. Academically, I scored at least average grades in classes so at least they didn’t believe I was intellectually impaired, but was always just “something” about me. I knew there was something too, but I knew it was from my extreme shyness. Whenever I did speak, I whispered so that no-one but myself could hear me speak. I was at the same time embarrassed to express myself and embarrassed to be so socially awkward. The solution to this problem was to continue silent.

As I grew older and started high-school I suddenly felt almost compelled to express myself – and in many forms. Some of my classmates whom I’d been to primary school with were absolutely shocked to see me for the first time speak, joke around, and finally have something to contribute verbally. Of course, although it did seem like a magical change in me, I guess I had also just been through puberty and the adolescent psychosocial needs of expression and personal identity were also taking over. I also did not improve in all arenas suddenly, and there are some social spheres I still struggle with, but becoming more self-aware of the problem also enabled me to seek help to improve. As with anyone who speaks of self-improvement will tell you, first you have to believe that you can change (and have the right motivation, and the desire to change, etc. etc.). But therein lies the problem of labelling yourself, because once you label yourself, you adopt the role and you forget that you can change if you’re motivated enough.

We often say "I'm shy" or "I'm depressed" and it's a much heavier statement than saying "I feel anxious in some social situations" or "sometimes I feel very down". The difficulty is that once we label ourselves it becomes a shield to hide behind (and not usually on purpose), that keeps us stagnant. If I start believing that I'm shy (or depressed) and I start describing myself as such, I will start acting like that at all times because that's what I've come to accept is my personality. It's very debilitating to label yourself long-term as anything because it limits your ability to grow. Whereas I could say, “I'm feeling sad right now”, if I say “I'm a depressed person” then I'm not describing a feeling but myself - and human beings don't find it easy to change what is essentially a part of themselves. I think of it as the equivalent as describing your skin colour; that's what our personalities can become if we describe ourselves by our character traits. It becomes as inescapable as our own skin. You soon can't get rid of your "shyness" or your "depression" the same way you can't change your skin. And what's worse is that one day it'll stop bothering us and we'll simply say "I can't and won't be happy because I'm a depressed person" or "I won't meet anyone new because I'm a shy person"...

There’s a speech by Margaret Cho, comedienne, that I’ve included below that describes much better than I ever could the negative consequences of lacking self-esteem, which I guess a big part of shyness is (at least in my experience).


From ‘The Notorious C.H.O.’
I have self-esteem, which is pretty amazing because I am probably someone who wouldn’t necessarily have a lot of self-esteem as I am considered a minority.

And if you are a woman, if you are a person of colour, if you are gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender; if you are a person of size, if you are person of intelligence, if you are a person of integrity – then you are considered a minority in this world! And it's going to be really hard for us to find messages of self-love and support anywhere, especially women’s and gay men’s culture. It’s all about how you have to look a certain way, or else you're worthless. You know, when you look in the mirror and you think, "Ugh, I'm so fat, I'm so old, I’m so ugly"? Don't you know that's not your authentic self? But that is billions upon billions of dollars of advertising. Magazines, movies, billboards, all geared to make you feel shitty about yourself, so that you will take your hard earned money and spend it at the mall on some turn-around cream that doesn't turn around shit.

When you don’t have self-esteem, you will hesitate before you do anything in your life. You will hesitate to go for the job you really want to go for. You will hesitate to ask for a raise. You will hesitate to call yourself an American. You will hesitate to report a rape. You will hesitate to defend yourself when you are discriminated against because of your race, your sexuality, your size, your gender. You will hesitate to vote. You will hesitate to dream.

For us to have self-esteem is truly an act of revolution, and our revolution is long overdue.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

On work and life

A few days ago I spoke with a friend who wants to study medicine. He has a good job that pays more than he would earn as a junior doctor, but what he wants to do is medicine. I’ve always encouraged him because if there’s one thing I’ve always believed is that the only thing that helps you achieve what you want isn’t who you know or how smart, rich, or “lucky” you are, but how badly you want it. Now if my friend is prepared to sacrifice his good salary to go back to being a full-time student for four years and then getting paid less than he is earning now, then I guess he must really want it.

Eventually my friend got accepted into medical school. I say eventually because in the meantime it’s taken him a few attempts at a silly entrance exam, he’s spent money on further study, and his wife has given birth to their first child. It’s taken him some time but now he is actually able to proceed onto the job he really wants – but he hesitates. Why? Why would someone spend so much time and effort striving to achieve this thing that he’s wanted for so long and then hesitate? He told me “once you have a kid, that’s all you can think about”. He told me how he’s also made these other sacrifices in the meantime. He’s changed jobs to accept one where he makes less money than he was before but that allows him to be home more often. His wife has ceased to work to stay home and care for their child. And he is now hesitating on accepting what once seemed like his dream job. But he told me he himself had trouble understanding why he came to do all these things, but all he could think to say was that his child was his life.

I felt such great admiration for him because he had realised that the greatest job he’ll ever do is that of being a parent. That the one job that he is not dispensable or replaceable at is that of being himself: his daughter’s father, his wife’s husband, and his friends’ friend. At the end of the day our jobs pay the bills, and we aim to be satisfied with what we do so it doesn’t hurt us more than we benefit from it. One thing I realised some time ago also is that your job doesn’t keep you warm at night, it doesn’t cry when you’re away from it, and it definitely will never love you back no matter how much you may love it.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

On "becoming" beautiful

I recently bought a new camera and I’ve just been taking photos of all sorts of random things and people. One of the things most people will often say to me when I ask to take their photo, though, is “not now, I look horrible”... Now, to myself I think “but this is how these people have chosen to present themselves today, why would that be ‘horrible’?” As I was thinking this, it reminded me of something I noticed a while ago – and maybe it has something to do with self-identity or the human concept of “beauty”. At the same time, I don’t want to be a hypocrite, and I’ll admit I once thought like those people.

Beauty is a very difficult to define concept, of course. You could say a rose is beautiful and say a woman’s face is beautiful, and not mean that the woman’s face looks like a rose. Also, one man’s wife may be beautiful to him but another man who has just met her may think nothing of her. There’s subjectivity involved, history and knowledge of a thing’s other than physical attributes involved, circumstance, and relativity of one thing to another of its kind.

I’ve always liked to take photos of things – just for fun. When I was younger I started to notice how some of the best photos to take are of children. Not all children, but children who are young enough to recognize themselves in a mirror, but not so young as to be too easily distractible when they’re awake. And when I say “the best photos”, I mean those that are most close to reality, the one’s that replicate a moment in time a little closer to the truth. I took so many photos of one of my nieces at one stage because with this childhood innocence came this absolute sincerity that even a camera (in my unskilled hands) could capture. Now, this little girl was just being herself and making it so easy for me to capture that “self”, so I took so many photos because I knew that the day would come where she would ask me if she looked ‘good’ in a photo. In fact what happened was that she then went to school and was taught to smile whenever a camera was in front of her. Don’t get me wrong, she was still beautiful, her appearance evolving with age (as it never ceases to do during our lifespan), but she had lost that sincerity that once came so naturally to her – and all because someone taught her that an attractive – and so photo-worthy face – must have a smile on it. A smile can make any face beautiful, that’s true, but that was probably first said about sincere smiles.

Before this period, though, my niece went through a stage where she figured out that the thing looking back at her in the mirror was herself. She had learnt before that what the general concept of a human face was: two eyes, nose, two nostrils, ears, mouth, hair, and attached to the rest of a body with arms, legs, etc. We first learn by stereotype, it’s essential; the world is just too difficult to comprehend otherwise. The fun times were standing in front of the mirror, her and me, pointing at this little person in the mirror and she realising it was herself because she is standing next to a person that looks exactly like me. Then she would laugh for ages. Most children will do that. They don’t notice that their clothes are all stained from when they spilt food on themselves, that there is things in their hair that came from the grass in the backyard. All these things are inconsequential details, the reality is that there in the mirror are two human beings, one which is herself, and one someone other than herself. This is self-awareness.

To return to photos, though. What is the first thing you notice when you look back at old photos? Yourself! Inevitably that is what you notice, it’s probably instinctual. You disregard the surroundings and the other people in the photo, and it’s not vanity, it’s just constancy to recognize yourself as you once were (because all moments are always in the past). Everybody has a self-image, a physical image and also a cognitive one that would recognize your own style of reasoning or speaking, for example. So the next thing we do with photos is to compare the image in the photo with our internal self-image, but also to this other image about “beautiful” human beings we have been conditioned to believe. So, often the internal thought process goes “does this look like me? does it look like me at my best physical appearance? and, does it look like those models in magazines and film actors?” When we were children the thought process was, “what is it? is it human?” and “who is it?”. Things were much simpler then. So, I won’t go on about how this “beautiful human being” mental image came to be formed because most people can probably guess it already.

My niece grew up, and she still likes photos; she even knows how to pose now. The skill difference between professional models and the rest of us is that the pros know how to look natural in a completely staged environment. That “natural” look and certain biometric features that some scientists with lack of better things to study have found is what we usually define as beauty. But my niece is beautiful too. She is beautiful because she’s my little girl, because she is a child, because there’s this sincerity about her, and because I love her. I’ve said nothing of her appearance, but you get the concept of a beautiful child like the hundreds we’ve all seen before. She is confident in herself and of her appearance. She’ll always let you take her photo, as long as you know she will always smile on cue for you.

But now, as adults, a lot of the people I come across don’t want their photo taken because they don’t look “beautiful” enough. I didn’t want a photo of a “beautiful” person, if I did I’d have cut it out of a magazine; I wanted a photo of the person who I’m asking. Has this image of un-beauty been so deeply ingrained in us or is it a universal lack of self-esteem that makes us shy away?

You know what else I’ve noticed in the last few years also? That the people that make good photos to take of are, other than children, the elderly and indigenous people with little exposure to western society. People of poor countries also have a tendency to view a request from a friend for a photo as a gesture similar to asking for a glass of water: ‘gladly, my friend, if I have enough to give’. And why do they care less than the average person about their appearance? I think because they think of a photo just as that, a thing that eventually will just come to be on a piece of paper as a representation of an event in time. But what about the elderly? Well, then I started thinking that perhaps they have had more time to have also come to this same reasoning, but also to accept their own physical appearance and it’s changing nature.

I was twenty-six by the time I finally stopped feeling ashamed of my own body. My weight has fluctuated since I was young, and since about the age of 12 I was ashamed of it. I’ve always struggled with low self-esteem despite my family thinking that I was OK because I got good grades at school, inside there was this loathing of myself from the core to my very skin. I felt ashamed of my body, to be who I was and how I was, and the last thing I wanted was to look at myself and let alone let anyone else see me. Mirrors were extremely uncomfortable places for me to stand in front of. Having to have a photo taken was almost an offensive gesture made at me. I didn’t want to look at myself. Anyhow, the whole thing made my life not very interactive and lonesome when I was young, though with study commitments I gradually expanded the number of things I became comfortable doing.

When I was 26, in my final year of med school, I finally came to the realisation that this was it, that this was my body, that this is who Vanessa was and I would just have to accept it. I finally realised that the people who spoke to me, who befriended me, or who were otherwise associated with me had chosen to do so despite of what horribleness I thought I looked like. If others could interact with me so easily, accept me as I was, then why should I not? The realisation sounds so simple now, but it had taken me 26, almost 27, years to reach. After that, it made romantic relationships easier to conceive, both in my mind and physically. I felt more at ease with being my true self. And even though 26 (or since) was probably not my best year in terms of physical appearance, I finally also accepted the changing nature of my appearance. And guess what? I finally stopped caring about what I looked like in photos.